Train the whole team before the next inspection
Seat licences for the department or the site, a manager view of progress and results, and completion records exported for the training matrix. Hosted on The GMP Training Academy.
Against the classroom course you were quoted
Budget holders compare on total cost, not list price. This does the comparison honestly, including the time your people spend away from the line.
Compare with the classroom course you were quoted
Enter your numbers. Nothing is stored. Time off site is counted for both options, and the online course is charged at its 2.5 hours of study, not zero.
- Classroom fees (12 × €1,400)
- €16,800
- Classroom time off site (12 × 2 d × €450)
- €10,800
- Classroom total
- €27,600
- Online seats (12 × €0, 5 to 19 seats, 15% off)
- Enter a budget
- Online study time (2.5 h each)
- €1,800
- Online total
- Enter a budget
You keep
€25,800
and nobody leaves the site for two days before the inspection.
Trained people make fewer defects, close faster and stay.
Regulators treat training as part of the quality system, not a favour to staff: EU GMP Chapter 2 requires it, requires its effectiveness to be assessed, and requires the records to prove it. The evidence says the same thing in numbers. Below: what the published studies found, what it looks like on your PQR KPIs, and the clause behind it.
41%
fewer quality defects
in the most engaged teams compared with the least engaged, across 112,000 business units. Engagement and development opportunities are measured together. [1]
26%
greater ability to deliver quality products
in organisations with a strong learning culture compared with those without. [2]
37%
higher employee productivity
in the same strong-learning-culture organisations; output per person, not hours. [2]
94%
would stay longer
of employees, at a company that invests in their learning. Retention is the quality metric nobody puts on the dashboard. [3]
The PQR KPIs a trained team moves
These are the numbers a QA head reports at management review and an inspector asks for when the PQR schedule comes up. No invented percentages here: measure yours over one review cycle before and one after, and you will have your own.
- 01
PQRs completed on schedule
Measured as: % of reviews approved by the due date in the annual schedule
Higher is better
Authors who know what each section needs collect the data through the year instead of in the last month. The review is written on time and the schedule stops slipping product by product.
- 02
PQRs with a trend evaluation
Measured as: % of reviews that evaluate trends, not just tabulate results
Higher is better
Chapter 1.10 asks for a review that verifies consistency and highlights trends. Trained authors plot, compare with the previous period and say what the data means, which is what an inspector reads first.
- 03
Conclusions that resulted in an action
Measured as: % of reviews with at least one CAPA or change control raised
Higher is better
A review that finds nothing is rarely believed. Authors who interrogate the data find the drift, the recurring deviation or the supplier issue, and the conclusion becomes a record with an owner.
- 04
PQR actions closed by the next review
Measured as: % of previous-period actions verified closed
Higher is better
Chapter 1.11 requires the previous actions to be assessed. Actions written with an owner, a date and a measurable outcome get closed; vague ones roll over year after year and turn into a finding.
- 05
CMO PQRs evaluated by the MAH on time
Measured as: % of contract-manufactured products with a documented MAH evaluation
Higher is better
Chapter 1.10 places the evaluation with the MAH regardless of who writes the review. Trained MAH staff know what to check, what to challenge and how to record it under the technical agreement.
- 06
QP referrals arising from the PQR
Measured as: count per year of issues escalated to the QP from the review
Higher is better
A review that reaches the QP with a clear conclusion supports certification under Annex 16. More referrals early means fewer surprises at batch release and fewer retrospective investigations.
Be first when the course opens
Leave a work email. You are notified before public launch and get the launch price. Nothing else is sent.
Sources
- [1]Gallup (2020). The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes: Q12 Meta-Analysis, 10th edition. 112,312 business units in 96 countries. Top-quartile business units on engagement showed 41% fewer quality defects, 81% lower absenteeism and 18% to 43% lower turnover than bottom-quartile units. Cross-industry meta-analysis. Gallup's engagement measure includes development and learning opportunities.
- [2]Bersin and Associates (2010). High-Impact Learning Culture: The 40 Best Practices for Creating an Empowered Enterprise. Organisations with a strong learning culture were 26% more able to deliver quality products, showed 37% greater employee productivity and were 46% more likely to be first to market. Cross-industry survey of about 40,000 organisations.
- [3]LinkedIn Learning (2018). Workplace Learning Report: The Rise and Responsibility of Talent Development in the New Labor Market. 94% of employees would stay longer at a company that invested in their career development. Cross-industry employee survey.
- [4]EudraLex Volume 4, EU Guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practice, Part I, Chapter 2: Personnel (2013), paragraphs 2.10 to 2.13. ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System (2008), section 2.4 Resource management. The regulatory requirement for training and for assessing its effectiveness.
Seats, oversight, records
- One seat per learner, assigned by the manager, transferable before first login
- Manager view: progress, assessment results by module, certificates issued
- Completion export (CSV) formatted for the training matrix
- Certificates with verifiable IDs an auditor can check
- Content mapped to your SOP numbers on request
- Optional live Q&A session with the course author for the team
Per seat, by tier
| 1 to 4 seats | List price | On launch |
| 5 to 19 seats | 15% off | On launch |
| 20 to 49 seats | 25% off | On launch |
| 50 seats and above | 35% off | On launch |
The discount tiers are fixed. The launch price is announced to the waitlist first.
Tell us the seat count and the deadline
A person replies within two working days with a quote, or you can buy seats directly on the academy.